Robert OToole Photography
  • Gear
  • Jan31

    3 Comments

    Quick Release Clamp Design Shootout

    What is the best QR clamp design for the nature / wildlife photographer?

    Over the last six months I have received so many questions about various Quick Release clamp designs I decided closely examine the two most common designs, standard knob style and lever style. Some nature photographers have blogged that one style being better than another so its time to look at the facts so you can decide for yourself.

    Since my current head of choice is the Jobu Design JR 3 gimbal head I thought I would start by asking Jobu for more details on their clamp designs and the pros and cons of the knob vs lever clamp types.

    Why does Jobu choose a knob type QR clamp design over a lever QR style clamp?

    From Jobu Design:

    1.       We do not use quick release lever style clamps on our gimbal heads. From  empirical testing and physical samples, I can 100% assure you that there is not enough consistency in the Arca-Swiss style of plates to

    guarantee a secure fit with every brand on the market. For customers holding thousands of dollars of camera equipment on our heads we cannot guarantee fit against other manufacturer’s tolerances in order to secure an adequate clamping force. We have tested samples from Arca-Swiss, Wimberley, Kirk, Markins, Kiwi, Foto-Pro, and dozens of no-name manufacturers, and they are all different. Arca-Swiss is a STYLE, not a STANDARD.

    2.       Our quick releases open/close much further than our competitor’s clamps to take up the slack of other manufacturers tolerances. We have twice as much clamping tolerance as most other quick releases on the market.

    3.       Quick release levers are prone to snag on branches, bags and clothing and possibly release, making them a liability in the field.

    4.       Our standard knobs such as the one on the JR 3 are very fast to open/close (faster than the lobed design on the our Pro head) and the size is appropriate for clamping pressure on small to medium telephoto lenses. Increasing the size may cause binding due to the ability to use excessive torque. We use a larger knob on the Pro head to allow stronger pressure for appropriate clamping strength, but it is a slower mechanism.

    5.       Our knobs are made from high-grade aluminum by a US manufacturer in a controlled environment. They can take a bashing, beating and continue to function day in and out.

    6.       We sell something like 5000+ of these knobs on various products per year. We have NEVER had a complaint about clamp design, not ONE. This is quite a testimonial.

    Example

    Jobu Design BWG-J3K Jobu Jr.3 Gimbal head clamp close up. For more information on this head see my JR 3 post: http://www.robertotoole.com/2011/07/07/jobu_jr3_gimbal_head/

    One of Jobu’s points about the varying Arca-Swiss style plate sizes on the market is interesting, lets look at the the sizes of some common QR plates that you might even be using. All measurements are thickness (or height) x width.

    Wimberley A = 9 x 38mm
    Wimberley B = 9 x 38mm
    4th generation A = 7.5 x 37mm
    4th generation B = 9 x 38mm
    Jobu A = 9 x 38mm
    Jobu B = 9 x 38mm
    Kirk = 8 x 37mm

    Looking at the above it looks like 9 x 38 mm is the most common size but some of the differences in plate dimensions are surprising, especially on two plates from 4th Generation. This is especially strange since 4th Generation uses non adjusting lever type QR clamps.

    Example

    4th Generation designs M3.5a quick release lever type clamp. This is an older example but I believe the 3.6 clamp design is unchanged.

    Advantages and disadvantages

    Knob clamp +
    Zero chance of accidental opening
    Lower cost due to fact that it is common
    Many different designs are available from many different manufacturers
    Never needs any adjustment for different QR plates

    Knob clamp -
    Slower to open and close vs lever style clamp but no adjustment is ever necessary

    Lever clamp +
    Quicker to open and close vs knob designs but needs careful set up and adjustment for different QR plates

    Lever clamp -
    Possible accidental release is always possible
    Higher expense due to the fact that there are less brands of lever QR clamps
    Adjustments are necessary for different QR plates to guarantee a secure fit

    My thoughts

    In my personal experience the lever QR clamps can be quicker to close and open but the down side to this speed is the adjustment necessary to get a real safe and secure fit with your lens plate. In the last 5 years of using lever QR clamps out in the field I have adjusted dozens and dozens of clamps for photographers to fit the different QR plate brands. Many time I have had to adjust a brand new head right out of the box. I have also had to adjustment a few famous photographer’s lever QR clamp heads so they clamped properly. Its a shame that the lever QR clamp head dealers and manufacturers are not honest with buyers about this. In fact one Mongoose dealer has stooped so low as to spread false rumors about the Jobu Jr 3 clamps not to mention failing to inform customers about the drawbacks to the QR lever clamps they sell.

    My personal preference

    Over the years I have used different Arca Swiss style quick release clamps and plates since the 1990s. I have used both knob type and lever clamps over the last 10 years including Wimberley I, Wimberley II, and Mongoose side mount lever QR heads. Currently I use Jobu gimbal heads with standard screw knob clamps and don’t see any reason to ever go back to a lever QR clamp even thought they can be faster to open and close. I prefer the lower cost, extra security and lack of adjustment needed with the standard screw knob clamp designs.

    I hope this information helps you understand the differences in the various head designs so you can make the best decision next time you are in the market for a new head.

    All content (including text, design, photos, layout, and graphics) are copyright © 2011 Robert OToole. All rights reserved.

  • Jan13

    3 Comments

    Example

    A Wildlife Photographers View of the Nikon D4

    Finally after 5 solid years Nikon has announced a successor to the D3. From a wildlife photographer’s perspective the the D4 looks impressive, and most importantly it looks like Nikon seems to have made an extensive series of small improvements and not a lot of big changes for still photographers. In other words it looks like they did not make any huge mistakes as Canon has done over the last few years with their pro cameras. Thankfully Nikon has aimed for it’s professional user-base and tried to improve the D3S which was probably one of the best, if not the best DSLR ever made.

    Upgrades

    Note: I have not had a chance to use the camera yet so all of this info is based on Nikon supplied info. If you would like to find out more of see Nikon’s brochure see the bottom of this post for links.

    Some of the more important  D4 photo shooting specs are a new higher-resolution 16.2MP full-frame CMOS sensor and the ability to shoot at 10 frames per second with AF. Most importantly the continuous shooting ability has been increased from 43 shots with the D3S to 97 NEF on a CF card and 105 NEF files with the new XQD card. Limited RAW file continuous shooting capability has always been a problem for action photographers since the first DSLR.

    Nikon reports that the  new Advanced Multi-CAM 3500FX AF system in the D4 has improved low light ability. A new 1005 pixel AE metering sensor has been replaced a new design with 91,000 pixels. The 3D tracking performance of this new color matrix metering has reportedly been dramatically improved. This is huge since I feel that the current Nikon AF system is the best AF system I have ever used. It is comforting  to see that Nikon has confirmed autofocus at f8 so super-telephoto NIKKOR users can use 1.7X and 2.0X teleconverters. Nikon has always had this capability on pro and pro-sumer cameras but new cameras like the Canon EOS-1DX  have dropped this capability. This is a very important issue for a lot of people including me.

    The D4 a lot of new interesting capabilities with the new WT-5 Wireless Transmitter. This will allow the user to log into your camera with a laptop, tablet or smartphone and will have access to a camera control panel and live view feed with a standard web browser.

    The Real Challenge

    Image quality is really most important and I think it is the D4’s biggest challenge. I feel that the Nikon D3S is the closest thing to the perfect camera on the market right now. Nikon promises that the D4 will offer even better image quality and even better low light performance. The D3S low light high ISO performance was almost unbelievable. For an example of what kind of file the D3S can produce, look at the image below.

    Example

    Dalmatian Pelican at 25,600 ISO, Greece, 2011. Nikon D3S with Sigma 50-500mm OS @ 340mm at 1/8000 F14, ISO 25,600. image copyright © 2012 Robert OToole.

    This is the kind of image quality the D4 has to beat. The image made at an astounding 25,600 ISO is almost completely noise free. For the record no noise reduction or blurring has been applied, yes the D3S is that good!

    I would be surprised if the D4 will be able to surpass the IQ of the D3S at high ISO but if it can at least match it the D4 will be worth the 3 year wait.

    Things Missing From the D4

    Enough resolution to make the D4 the first true dual mode camera. Rumors have been circulation for years that the D4 would offer high full frame resolution and a 12-14 MP 1.5x crop mode with a higher frame rate. This would be the ultimate camera for action and outdoor photographers. Full frame and a faster 1.5x mode when you need extra speed and reach. The D4 offers more resolution but it looks like it will only provide about 6-7 MP in crop mode. Maybe next time? D800 maybe?

    No removable viewfinder, I still miss this feature from the film SLR pro camera era.

    No built in incident meter.

    No removable upgradable sensor.

    No removable low pass filter.

    No built in RAID SSD hard drive with thunderbolt connector for downloading.

    What I Do Not Like About the D4

    Nikon made a mistake dropping the AF-Mode selector on the back of the camera and replacing it with the the same AF mode / AF manual mode combination switch from the D7000. All of the online reviews I have read claim that this change is an improvement, for me its a bad move for photographers. Nikon went from a brilliant AF-Mode switch that only took a single finger to operate without even looking.  The D4 / D7000 design uses an outer collar that rotates to select auto or manual focus, and selects the AF mode when the center of the selector is pressed while the command dial is rotated. Honestly almost all D7000 owners I have met dont even know how to use the combo switch. I don’t even have my D4 ordered yet but I already miss old style AF-Mode switch.

    At least they didn’t touch the AF-On button!

    D4 Links

    Nikon D4 brochure link:

    http://www.nikonusa.com/en_US/o/QD8q_b3vH8Re-n_CPUtpjBl-qbE/PDF/D4_brochure.pdf

    More Nikon D4 info:

    http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/nikon-d4/nikon-d4A.HTM

    http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-11673-12259

    All content (including text, design, photos, layout, and graphics) are copyright © 2011 Robert OToole. All rights reserved.

  • Dec12

    6 Comments

    Thinking about buying a macro lens for the first time or thinking about upgrading soon? Instead of comparing a big load of specs and lens photos lets look at some real world images to help you decide on a lens. To see what effect focal length would have on the subject and the background I made this series of images with 3 different lenses, 180, 150 and 50mm. To keep the subject size constant the camera and tripod was moved closer for each lens change. F/7.1 was used to make all of these images.

    Example

    Orchid at 180mm, National Orchid Garden, Singapore. NIKON D700 and Sigma 180mm f/3.5 EX DG IF HSM APO lens, 1/125 sec at F7.1, manual metering on zero, ISO 640. Image Copyright 2011 Robert OToole Photography.

    This image was made with a 180mm macro lens, my personal favorite. The sharpness and bokeh,  aesthetic quality of the out-of-focus areas, are extremely good. The long working distance (distance to the subject) allows you to stay farther away from the subject with the 180. This makes lighting easy and helps keep you safer if you are photographing something that can bite or sting. Making this orchid image was easy and I was able to photograph from about 4 feet away!

    The 180’s small angle of view makes it easier to keep the background clean and free of unwanted objects compared to a shorter focal length lens. In terms of sharpness I find the 180 sharp at all apertures and works very well with 1.4x, 1.7x (Nikon only), and 2x teleconvertors/extenders. 180mm is a popular focal length and available from almost all the major manufacturers (Nikon makes a great 200mm f/4 macro).

    How does the 180mm compare to a 150mm lens?

    Example

    Orchid at 150mm, National Orchid Garden, Singapore. NIKON D700 and 150mm F2.8 EX APO DG HSM Macro, 1/100 sec at F7.1, manual metering on zero, ISO 640. Image Copyright 2011 Robert OToole Photography.

    The 150mm is extremely sharp, light, compact and works great with teleconverters.  This is the lens I usually reach for when I am packing for a trip. Using this lens in the field was a pleasure, the working distance for this image was a respectable 3 feet. Sigma is the only manufacturer that makes this focal length but I would not hesitate to recommend this lens to any camera owner regardless of brand. This is not the stabilized version of the 150 macro and unfortunately I have not had a chance to use the new OS version of this lens. I have heard good things about the Sigma 150 OS and I look forward to getting to try one in the future.

    Example

    Orchid at 50mm, National Orchid Garden, Singapore. NIKON D700 and 50mm F2.8 EX DG Macro lens, 1/100 sec at F7.1, manual metering on zero, ISO 640. Image Copyright 2011 Robert OToole Photography.

    The 50mm macro is a good all around lens and is reasonably priced when compared to other macro lenses. The biggest strength of this lens is the size and weight but the focal length is just too short if you are photographing small subjects especially small moving subjects. This lens was my least favorite to use since it was so difficult to use in the field. The camera was only about 1 foot away from the orchid  when I made this image so it was hard not to block light and to position the tripod.

    Example

    Orchid at f/7.1 with 180mm, 150mm, 50mm macro lenses. Image Copyright 2011 Robert OToole Photography.

    When I made these comparison images I did not exactly know what to expect and I was shocked to such a big disparity in background quality between the 180 and 150 images.What do you think?

    The 150 image above looks sharp and the background looks good but compared to the 180 image there is no contest. For a nature / wildlife photographer I would rate the 180 by far the best in terms of image quality and ease of use in the field. Even though I own all three of these (and a 105 macro) I always choose the 180 when I go out to do macro photography and the 150mm when I travel. Most modern macro lenses on the market today are comparable but make sure you choose a lens with an ultrasonic motor, called USM, HSM, or AF-S. This gives you a huge advantage when photography anything in motion, this is very important even in macro photography.

    I hope this information images helps you decide on a macro lens or maybe even make you think about upgrading to a longer macro lens in the future.

    Notes:
    I did not include a 80 or 105mm macro in this comparison but based on experience  I would put this range in between the 50 and 150 but nowhere close to the 180.
    Don’t forget that when you change camera sensor types, full frame to DX for example, the effective focal length will change but the lens angle of view will not.
    If you plan to use teleconvertors or extenders  with your macro lens make sure you check with the manufacturer. Some lenses like the Sigma macro lenses used in this comparison only work with the manufacturers own lenses. A Nikon teleconvertor will not work on the these Sigma lenses, but the new Sigma 150mm OS lens does work with the new Canon extenders.

    Unfortunately one lens I used to make this comparison, the Sigma 180mm is discontinued. I hope Sigma replaces it with a 180mm  OS macro in the future.

    Another factor to consider when deciding on a focal length is that modern internal focusing auto focus lenses will actually shrink as they focus closer even if the physical length remains the same. This is due to IF lens design, they shift lens elements or element groups within the lens as they focus closer. So a 200mm lens is not a 200mm lens at a close focus distance. Nikon actually published this data for the old 200mm F/4 micro-Nikkor macro lens, this lens would shrink to 140mm at 1:2. The new  Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm 2.8G ED II shrinks to 160mm at 1:18.
  • Jul13

    No Comments

    Example

    Image Copyright 2011 Robert OToole / Robert OToole Photography.

    I have been using  WD Passport drives for my business for ages, I can remember when they were only 60 GB in capacity and cost over $250. So I was shocked when I came across a pallet of new 1TB USB 3.0 versions at my local Costco for only $89. This is one of those must have pieces of gear for nature photographers and the Western Digital My Passports continue to be the best out there. For my trip to Alaska later this week to lead my annual brown bear workshops I will be bringing 2 of these 1TB drives with me.

    These drives are about 4 x 3 x .7 inches and come in a glossy black and my favorites, the fine matte finished versions in silver, blue, and red. The drive has a clean rounded design and only one connector port. Make sure you look for a dealer like Costco that includes a free case. The cases cost about $10 if you have to buy them separately.

    Example

    Image Copyright 2011 Robert OToole / Robert OToole Photography.

    The good news is that they are fast as advertised, transferring files back and forth to my laptop I was able to get about 3x faster transfer rates than a 2.0 drive WD Passport USB. This drive uses a USB 3.0/2.0 connection which is also called Super Speed USB that will work with both USB 3.0 or 2.0 computers.

    The cable supplied has a USB 3.0/2.0 make connector on one side and the USB 3.0 Micro B plug on the other. These cables are available from cable supply outlets. You can distinguish a USB 3.0 cable by the blue colored insert in the computer side connector and the Super Speed label.

    What if you don’t have USB 3.0 or use a Mac? I would still pick up a couple of them since they are future proof and are still great value even working at USB 2.0 speeds.

    This is an awesome device, Western Digital’s best so far and at a full terabyte and an great value for such a reasonable price.

    All content (including text, design, photos, layout, and graphics) are copyright © 2011 Robert OToole. All rights reserved.

  • Jul11

    No Comments

    Right after I arrived at LAX (Los Angeles International airport) it happened. As I yanked my roller over a curb I heard a crack and my roller’s handle came off in my hand! It was a clean stress fracture across both sides. This roller is over 3 years old but I think the damage might have been caused by getting slammed by the overhead bin door on my flight.

    It was nine at night and I needed my roller to travel soon for an upcoming job. A sent off a quick email to Think Tank’s customer service that night. I expected a reply soon but this was amazing. At 9:14 am the next morning Randy Wentzel from Think Tank emailed me back to say that he already had a new handle assembly on its way to my CA address. This was not some inside connection in customer service, I used the customer service email address from the Think Tank site! That is exceptional customer service!

    Thanks again Randy!

    Example

    As a professional I have been using Think Tank for what seems like forever and its a great feeling to see a company come through for you when you really need them.

    If you need anything at all from Think Tank, use my workshop link for a free gift: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/?code=WS-159

  • Jul7

    41 Comments

    Example

    Image Copyright 2011 Robert OToole / Robert OToole Photography.

    Jobu Design Jr.3 Gimbal Head BWG-J3K

    In a little over a week I will be leaving for a 26 day trip to Alaska to lead three sold out brown bear workshops. As I prepare for this trip I am looking forward to sharing my equipment choices here on my blog. The Jobu Design Jr.3 gimbal head is one of my newest  pieces of equipment and will be coming to Alaska with me for the first time. Over the three months of field testing this head has become my new favorite and has now replaced my 4th Generation Mongoose as my main gimbal head.

    You should take a serious look at this head and if you are interested in buying one Jobu offered my blog readers and workshop participants a special 15% or $52 discount. See the bottom of this post for ordering details. Jobu Jr. 3 heads will also be available for test drives in all of my future workshops. Also if you are in the Tampa or Los Angeles area and would like to give the head a try let me know.

    In August I will be posting a Jobu Design Jr.3 complete field report from Alaska but for now here are some highlights to get you interested.

    Lightweight 1.4 lb (725 g)

    This is lighter than the mongoose and less than half the weight of the Wimberley II head.

    Superb lockout power

    This head locks and stays locked even with a side mounted 500mm VR Nikkor lens.

    Superb smooth and linear clamping

    This head makes it easy to dial in just the right amount of pre-load for the smoothest planning and tilting you have ever seen.

    Compact size

    At 9 x 8″ (22.86 x 20.32cm) this is smaller than a Mongoose and about half the size of a Wimberly II.

    Flexible horizontal or side mounting

    The removable swing arm (HM-J2) makes converting to a lighter side mount style easy.

    Giant rubberized knobs

    Rubberized knobs make handling in cold and wet weather easy even with gloves.

    Left or right hand set up

    This is a great feature if you are like me and like to mount your gimbal head on the right side to keep your lens controls on the left side accessible.

    Solid and rigid design

    The one-piece hollow, cast, heat treated design keeps the head totally free from flex.

    Arca-Swiss Compatible Quick Release Clamp

    The clamp design makes lever clamp style  pre-load adjustments unnecessary.

    Great customer service

    Jobu Design makes customer service and support a first priority.

    Excellent value

    $349 for such a well engineered, high quality, high performance head is unheard of in the tripod head industry.

    To purchase this head directly from Jobu with the 15% discount follow these simple instructions.

    1. Follow this link, a new window should open if not open a new tab in your browser and past the address into the URL window.

    http://www.jobu-design.com/catalog/item/2588354/7937720.htm

    2. Look for the orange add to cart button on the right side. Press the button to add the item to your cart

    3. Look for the promo code box right below the price . Click in the box and enter the my special promo code in all lower case, no capital letters:

    robert

    4. Press the orange update button under the subtotal box.

    5. Press the orange checkout button or the continue shopping button right next to the update button.

    Please let us know if you have any questions or problems ordering anything on the Jobu site.

    Email Robert@RobertOToolePhotography.com or call 310.619.8017

    All content (including text, design, photos, layout, and graphics) are copyright © 2011 Robert OToole. All rights reserved.